What is GlobeArc?

Many architecture environments require information to be synchronized between products, modules, or independently maintained models. GlobeArc takes a different approach.

Process models, capability maps, value streams, application landscapes, reports, queries, and analytics draw from the same underlying repository. When an application, capability, stakeholder, or other object is used in multiple places, those views can reference the same record rather than creating another copy.

This provides a common foundation for business architecture, process architecture, application architecture, and transformation planning.

Properties provide the information needed to describe and analyze those objects and relationships. They can also support calculated values, classifications, reporting, and other forms of analysis.

Enterprise architecture describes how the different parts of an organization fit together. Business process management examines how work is structured and performed. In practice, the two depend on much of the same information.

A process is performed by people and organizational units. Its activities can depend on applications and information. Those applications support business capabilities, while capabilities contribute to value streams and strategic objectives. Separating these domains makes it harder to understand the impact of change across them.

GlobeArc connects process architecture and enterprise architecture through shared information and relationships. Teams can move from a process to the applications, stakeholders, organizational units, capabilities, and other objects associated with it without rebuilding that context in another tool.

An enterprise metamodel needs enough structure to answer useful questions, but starting with an extensive modeling exercise can make adoption unnecessarily difficult.

GlobeArc Use Case Blueprints begin with the decision or problem a team wants to address. They identify the object types, relationship types, and properties required for that use case, show where the existing metamodel has gaps, and help establish missing elements.

This gives organizations a guided way to develop the architecture information they need without making a large upfront modeling exercise the starting point.

GlobeArc's approach to AI is based on controlling what AI can do with architecture information rather than giving an AI system unrestricted access to the underlying database.

For query access through GlobeArc's MCP capability, requests use a validated Abstract Syntax Tree, or AST, rather than allowing an AI agent to generate executable SQL or GraphQL. The MCP service does not connect directly to the database, and its query scope is read-only regardless of a user's normal application role.

GlobeArc also provides a narrowly scoped BPMN process-model import capability for agent-assisted workflows. That write path uses the same process validation approach as other process imports.

GlobeArc is not trying to differentiate simply by offering another diagram type or claiming that enterprise architecture and process modeling belong in the same product. The more important distinction is that different views of the organization can originate from the same connected information.

That changes how teams work with architecture. A capability map doesn't need its own version of an application. A BPMN model doesn't have to invent another representation of an organizational unit. A value stream doesn't need to recreate capabilities that already exist elsewhere. The same objects and relationships can provide context across each view.

The result is a connected enterprise architecture and process environment built around several principles:

Simulation and Current vs Target process analysis

GlobeArc doesn’t aim to replace every specialist modeling, process mining, GRC, or project portfolio management capability. Its focus is connecting enterprise information so architects, process teams, transformation leaders, and decision-makers can understand how the organization fits together and what a proposed change could affect.